jacey: (Default)
[personal profile] jacey
I should have read this years ago, but I've finally made it.

A policeman lies in a hospital bed nursing a broken leg and a king-sized beef about the fairness of life. A friend gets him interested in the mystery of Richard III and who really killed the princes in the tower. With the aid of a researcher to do the leg-work and unearth original sources he gradually solves the mystery and we learn as he learns. It's all pieced together as a police procedural and it makes fascinating reading. I'm convinced. It's a great example of how the winners write the history. Poor old Dicky 3, who by all accounts was an excellent if short-lived monarch, was very probably the victim of a fit-up by Henry 7 and his cronies. How it all happened and the conclusions drawn from original sources is really the heart of this book. It's not about the result, it's about the process.

Date: Dec. 5th, 2012 05:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lil-shepherd.livejournal.com
Please, don't treat this book as history, because it treats its sources in a cavalier fashion. In fact, one historian was so incensed that he wrote a detective story of his own analysing where Tey took her theories from, what she missed out and why the dating does not work. (I don't recommend To Prove a Villain because, to be frank, it is a pretty awful detective story, but the history is much more accurate.)

Most importantly, Tey misses out Mancini's contemporary reports from London and that the people there were convinced of the Princes' murder by Richard. These were already available.

January 2026

M T W T F S S
    1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 3rd, 2026 08:07 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios